Some people consider each and every word uttered by ‘our master’ as ‘immutable fundamental principles’ of homeopathy.

They would profusely quote his ‘aphorisms’ from organon as unquestionable ‘ultimate proof’ of their arguments whenever some body raises any scientific question during discussions. Some others would even include the words of other ‘stalwarts’ like Kent, Herring and the like also in the category of ‘fundamental’ principles.

They would declare that whatever ‘master’ and other ‘stalwarts’ said 200 years ago were “ultimate science” and should not be changed or even questioned. They would not tolerate any attempt of re-reading those ‘theories’ in the light of scientific knowledge humanity has amassed during last two centuries after Hahnemann lived on this earth. According to them, organon represents the ‘time less’ and ‘unlimited’ wisdom of our master, which is beyond any historical limitation.
This dogmatic approach is not acceptable to scientific method.

Reply · Report Post