There is an inherent conflict in homeopathy between right objective observations and their wrong subjective explanations.

Similia Similibus Curentur and potentization are two fundamental objective observations the great genius of hahnemann made regarding the phenomenon of cure, through his studies and experiments. But he explained these right observations using totally unscientific subjective speculations and theorizations, due to the limitations of scientific knowledge available to him.

If you approach homeopathy with a rational scientific perspective, it is a great medical science, deserving to be recognized as an advanced branch of modern molecular medicine. If you approach it with an unscientific mind set, of course you will talk unlimited nonsense theories about it.

I am trying to resolve this inherent conflict, by explaining homeopathy in scientific terms.

Reply · Report Post