Criticising Chris Kaias, and who the real hypocrites are.

---

Since the release of his analysis on the CAS verdict, @ChrisKaias has been the target of sustained criticism and attack, largely by Essendon fans unhappy with him.

And I'm here to tell you, you can take issue with the content of his message if you think their is a reason to do so, but this personal attack is complete crap - and bloody hypocritical to boot.

For more than three years now Essendon fans have (rightfully) complained at the utter idiocy and thoughtless junk spewed their way by opposition fans. People of such mind numbing stupidity that they can barely string a sentence together, but think they know all there is to know about the supplement scandal. People so easily led by the nose by a willful media that I genuinely fear for the future of the human race.

Fucking idiots basically.

And yet, I'm now watching Essendon fans demonstrate the same stupidity in their witless, brainless assault on this guy. Daft and hypocritical.

What exactly has the guy done? He live tweeted a court case, and I was certainly grateful for the information, free from the agenda based shit we so often see from our own media. Just a reporting of the facts as they occurred.

Since then, Chris has offered legal commentary and his analysis of the circumstances. The bloke is educated in the field, I dare say he has the right to offer an informed opinion.

But he dressed up as an Essendon druggie...

So fucking what? I could care less. He isn't the first, and he won't be the last to make fun of the situation - how does that in any way change his learned view on the legal aspects of this scandal? If he makes an error in his analysis because he doesn't like Essendon, call him out on it! I certainly will; but generally speaking he hasn't got a lot wrong when talking about the legalities.

But he's not impartial....

And Caroline Wilson is? Patrick Smith?

People don't have to be impartial to offer an informed view. I'm not impartial, I'm a passionate Essendon supporter; does that stop me making an informed view?

I don't give a shit if he's an Essendon hating, scum supporting, piss taking asshole. What I care about is the content of his commentary, and whether or not I agree with it.

And guess what? You may not like it, but for the most part, he isn't wrong - you just don't want to hear it, And yet you'll eat shit up written by some unhinged others like it's gospel, despite it often being riddled with errors because it supports your viewpoint. At best, that's confirmation bias, and at worst, that's flat out delusion.

I've seen people posting to law firms suggesting they shouldn't hire the guy.

Are you fucking kidding? You want to try and mess with the guys livelihood because he offered an analysis? That's absolutely disgusting.

Address his points, attack the analysis, not the man - or you're as bad as every asshole that's done the same thing to you.

Reply · Report Post