.@HULK__33 I gave you the example of the liar's bible to show how it is irrational to believe a book that contains a claim of its own truth. That same post explains the irrationality of faith:
http://ronmurp.net/2013/09/30/can-faith-ever-be-rational/

The faith you have in your religion is the same methodology of belief used by those that follow other religions. Clearly faith isn't reliable. That's why it is often called blind faith. But it's worse than that. Blind faith is the faith of the ignorant. When so many people still cling to faith when evidence and reason fail them, then that is an astonishing failure of rationality.

"Quran testifies other books as well. But other books are tempered now. And Quran isn't."

So says you. That's simply an assertion with no foundation. Just like the same assertion coming from people of other religions.

You've already declared that this is your **faith** position, and you are yourself discounting any evidence you might now offer to back up that claim. Can't you see the hopelessly naive position you are taking?

"religions need no evidence. Its faith. And such a faith comes through loving the personality of prophet"

What prophet? How do you know there was a prophet? Because of the evidence that is the book the Quran and the Hadith that tell you of the life of the prophet? How do you know that the Quran contains any truth at all? Because the Quran says so - because you rely on the evidence of the words of the Quran?

What you are doing here, when claim it is faith and not evidence, is you are discounting the very evidence you use to support your particular faith, your particular religion.

This is all such an irrational position to take.

Reply · Report Post