Important comment from Helena @vindicatemj The Plan of Leaving Neverland


Susanne, even if it seems that Dan Reed is against pedophilia (and he himself thinks so), he is still working for their cause, because the initial shock or “introduction” to the topic is part of their big P. plan (the NAMBLA agenda disclosed by Victor Gutierrez decades ago when they said they were going to use MJ as their “poster boy”).
And this is their first open step in realizing this plan.

The idea of the plan is to first make people talk about it, no matter how disgusting it is. This shock is needed by them to desensitize the public and eventually make people not that reactive and sensitive to all those words and descriptions. And when people get used to the fact that this subject can be discussed, they will make a step further.
From this point of view the fact that for three and a half hours Robson and Safechuck are just “describing” the horrible things (that never happened) and the public is subjected to all those details again and again, the film may be considered the realization of that plan and sheer pedophilia propaganda.

For everyone to understand what this film is doing to people’e minds imagine the alleged “victims” of a cannibal who miraculously survived while in his captivity.
Will anyone in their right minds allow these alleged victims to describe in most disgusting detail what the beast was doing to his victims? And for three hours too? Detail after detail, scene after scene… Wouldn’t everyone immediately understand that such a thing is absolutely unacceptable? And that it is actually nothing else but the promotion of it?

Won’t the various authorities and public immediately call for banning this propaganda film? EVEN in case the filmmakers claim that they are “against it”? But how can they be against it if they sort of relish these scenes? And allow these “victims” to describe it in most horrible detail?

Now add to it that all of it is just fiction and there was no cannibal, and everything they are describing is just an invention. What will be left if you deduct from this formula the crime that was never committed? The only thing that will be left is PROPAGANDA of the perversion.

This Leaving Neverland ‘documentary’ should be banned altogether, and not only as a fake about MJ but also, and in the first place, as a film propagating pedophilia – even if they pronounce all the right words about how disgusted they are and how horrible it is.
After all Victor Gutierrez’s book is banned in the US due to its openly pedophilia content, and how is this film better?

Of course real victims of abuse should tell everything that happened to them to the police, because this is where they are supposed to speak about the crimes committed to them. The police are specially trained to handle these stories, but even they do have their breakdowns after hearing it, and they will certainly not discuss all those heinous details in the public.
But describing all of it on TV? Especially when it is a flat lie told by the people who testified to the opposite twice?

What else can it be other than a big pedophilia plan?

Reply · Report Post